Read the author-supplied note rather than a download badge
The Pusab resource under Dharma Type’s profile reproduces a Flat-it note signed by Ryoichi Tsunekawa. It permits commercial and noncommercial work and describes credit, samples and links as optional gestures. That is useful evidence for this resource, rather than a rule applying to every similarly styled font. The page’s comment section contains game associations, but those comments do not establish a documented original commission or official relationship. Keep a file’s maker and usage note separate from an audience’s visual associations.
Proof a rounded title with its awkward characters included
Set a real title with repeated letters, a numeral and the punctuation the project requires. Compare an all-capitals version with ordinary capitalization where the resource supports it. At the intended display size, inspect the enclosed spaces in letters and the gaps between adjacent rounded forms. A word can appear tightly packed even when its character spacing is numerically even. Adjust the particular pair or the title layout rather than inserting arbitrary spaces into the source wording.
Keep a clear route from title experiment to final output
Place the selected title over both a plain background and the actual illustration, then compare the smaller exported image as well as the working layout. An independent Fredoka specimen gives a separate rounded-lettering comparison; it is not Pusab. Leave instructions, dates and longer captions in a simpler companion family. The homepage’s rounded and bold text transformations changes Unicode characters for copyable messages; it does not install Pusab or carry its exact outlines between applications. Retain the normal text and editable source when sharing a flattened title graphic.
Your questions, answered.
Who is credited in the Pusab author note?
The reproduced Flat-it note is signed by Ryoichi Tsunekawa. The resource appears under the Dharma Type profile.
Do game references in comments prove the font was commissioned for a game?
No. They indicate viewers’ associations. An original commission claim needs a separate primary source.
Sources & background
Sources supporting this page’s explanations. Practical examples are our editorial suggestions.