Identify the ParaType script and its documented design date
The ParaType Diana account credits Sergey Volhonsky and dates the design to 2002. It describes an original calligraphic script for advertising and display use and lists one style. Its separate marketplace debut notice is not the design date. Use the actual publisher specimen when looking for this resource rather than substituting another family that happens to contain Diana in its title.
Distinguish ASF Diana’s text-family structure
ASF Diana’s publisher record credits Angella Poghosova and the Edik Ghabuzyan foundry. It documents a serif family with five upright weights and their italics, supporting Latin, Armenian and Cyrillic. This is a different resource from ParaType’s script. For a multilingual editorial proof, use the approved text in each script and compare its heading, paragraph and italic emphasis together. The existence of a script in a family description does not replace proofing the characters your document needs.
Select the resource by the document’s job
For a short invitation heading, compare the complete name in the script specimen before selecting supporting text. For an editorial page, compare regular paragraph text and its real italic companion rather than using a decorative title to judge reading rhythm. Record the foundry, family and chosen style in the handoff. The homepage’s elegant text variations substitute Unicode characters; they do not install either Diana family, select an italic file or add language coverage to a font. Follow each publisher for the original resource and applicable terms.
Your questions, answered.
Are ParaType Diana and ASF Diana the same font?
No. Their publisher records identify different designers, family structures and text roles.
Which date does the ParaType account give for the design?
It explicitly dates Volhonsky’s design to 2002; a marketplace debut is a separate event.
Sources & background
Sources supporting this page’s explanations. Practical examples are our editorial suggestions.